Working together

What changes when an agency holds your product

Handling a product can reveal what a specification misses: weight, texture, resistance and the way the box opens.

You send the brief, the photographs, the product page and the specification. Back comes an advert that is competent, clean, on brand, and exactly what you imagined when you sent the email.

A result that matches the brief may be exactly right. It is still worth asking whether the team discovered anything in the product that the brief did not capture.

What can a brief not tell anybody?

How the thing behaves.

A brief can describe weight, finish and handling, but a sample lets the team test those details for themselves: how the lid opens, where the surface catches light and what the packaging sounds like.

Those things are the advert. A viewer deciding whether something is worth money is reading exactly those signals, and none of them can be inferred from a photograph, because a photograph is the product already flattened into the version everybody expects.

Which is why work made from a brief alone tends to look like every other advert in the category. It was built from the same source material the category shares: a clean image on white.

What changes when somebody has held it?

Four things, reliably.

The weight becomes visible

Weight cannot be photographed but it can be performed. Somebody who has picked up your product knows whether it is lifted with one finger or two hands, whether it is set down gently because it is heavy or because it is delicate. Watch any ad where the handling looks slightly wrong and you are watching somebody who has only seen pictures.

The real texture appears

Every material behaves in a particular way under a particular light. Brushed metal, matte card, soft-touch plastic, uncoated paper, glass with a slight green edge: each of those needs a different lighting decision to look like itself, and the decision cannot be made in advance. It is made by putting the thing on a table and moving a lamp around it until the surface reads correctly.

The opening becomes a shot

If the packaging does something, that is footage. A lid with a magnet, a seal that tears in one clean line, a tray that lifts to reveal the second layer. Somebody working from photographs treats the box as an obstacle to be cut around, so the box appears, then a transition, then the product. Somebody who has opened it knows there was a moment in there.

The flaw gets addressed

Ask what customers find confusing or difficult: assembly, a fragile finish, a colour that varies on screens. Handling the product helps the team decide what to demonstrate and explain honestly.

How does this show up in the timeline?

As time spent before anything is shot, and less time spent afterwards fixing things.

Being asked to send the product is not an odd request and it is worth making unprompted. Where a shoot is being planned, the same request goes in early, because a set designed around an object nobody has held is a set designed from a photograph.

Seeing the product before the shoot lets you test the surface, spacing and light against the actual finish. That can reduce surprises when the full setup is running.

What should you notice when you are briefing somebody?

Whether they asked.

You are trying to work out, before any money moves, whether the people making your advert will understand the product or reproduce your brief. The most reliable signal available to you is small and it happens early: did anybody ask to see the thing.

A few others, in order of how much they tell you. Did they ask what the packaging does, or only what is in it. Did they ask which part of the product people misunderstand. Did they ask what customers complain about, which is a question about the flaw and a sign that somebody intends to deal with it. Did they ask to keep it for a while, rather than for the shoot day.

None of that requires you to know anything about video. It requires you to notice which questions arrive.

Start with the product itself

Send the thing. Whoever is making your next advert, send them a unit before the brief is finalised, and send a second one if it is the sort of product that gets used up or opened once.

If you are comparing suppliers, agree what they will examine and what feedback to expect. A useful response notices something specific and explains why it matters to the work.

Choose a supplier for the quality of their observation and judgement, as well as their ability to deliver. Handling the product is one useful way to build that understanding; it does not guarantee a better idea.

Sources and evidence

Our method. A unit of the product is requested before the brief is finalised, ahead of the shoot day, so decisions about weight, texture, the opening and the flaw are made by somebody who has handled the thing rather than inferred from a photograph. Whether a supplier asks for the product, unprompted, is treated as the clearest early signal of whether they will reproduce a brief or understand what they are filming.

Product knowledge

Keep reading

Filming

Unboxing videos that are not an afterthought

Read the piece →
Working together

How to brief a video editor

Read the piece →
Growth

Why your ad looks good and sells nothing

Read the piece →
Working together

Is a free audit just a sales call?

Read the piece →
Start here

Start with the Free Audit

Send a link to your work.

A bare domain, a full URL, a channel link or an ad library link.
Received. We reply in writing, usually within three working days.
That did not send. Try once more, or write to us instead.

Your audit usually arrives within three working days. We use your details only to reply to your enquiry.

What you will get

✓

What is working, what could improve and whether we can help.

✓

Two or three priorities, with the reason for each.

✓

A recommended next step, even if that step is not us.

There is no obligation to continue. We only arrange a call if you ask for one.